Mesothelioma Lawsuits: Asbestos Exposure in Texas Cities and Counties
Texas has seen its share of mesothelioma lawsuits stemming from asbestos exposure in various cities and counties across the state. The litigation often revolves around industrial sites, construction projects, and other areas where asbestos was commonly used in the past. Cities like Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio have witnessed cases of asbestos-related diseases due to industrial activities and older building materials. Workers in industries such as oil refineries, chemical plants, and shipyards are particularly vulnerable to asbestos exposure, which can lead to severe health complications like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.
Rural counties in Texas are not exempt from asbestos exposure risks, as natural deposits of asbestos can also pose significant hazards to residents and workers. Efforts to address these risks involve identifying and safely removing asbestos-containing materials from buildings and infrastructure, as well as providing medical support and legal recourse to affected individuals. Asbestos litigation in Texas underscores the importance of ongoing efforts to raise awareness about the dangers of asbestos exposure and ensure that adequate measures are in place to protect public health.
Quick Facts About Asbestos Exposure in Texas:
Industrial Legacy: Texas has a rich industrial history, with sectors such as oil and gas, construction, and manufacturing contributing to widespread asbestos use in the past.
Occupational Hazards: Workers in industries like oil refineries, chemical plants, shipyards, and construction are at heightened risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in equipment, buildings, and infrastructure.
Environmental Concerns: Natural deposits of asbestos in certain regions of Texas pose environmental risks, potentially exposing residents and workers to asbestos fibers through activities like mining or natural erosion.
Health Impacts: Asbestos exposure can lead to serious health conditions such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis, often with symptoms appearing years or even decades after initial exposure.
Legal Recourse: Victims of asbestos-related diseases in Texas have legal options to seek compensation from responsible parties, including asbestos manufacturers, employers, and property owners.
Regulatory Measures: Efforts to mitigate asbestos hazards in Texas include regulations for asbestos handling and disposal, as well as ongoing monitoring and enforcement to protect public health and safety.
TO GET HELP – Our Nationwide Toll-Free Mesothelioma Helpline Number is 888.640.0914
History of Asbestos Exposure in Texas:
Asbestos exposure in Texas dates back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries when the mineral was widely used in various industries across the state. Its heat resistance, strength, and affordability made it a popular choice for insulation, roofing materials, and fireproofing in construction, as well as in shipbuilding, automotive manufacturing, and oil refineries.
Industrial Boom: Texas experienced significant industrial growth during the mid-20th century, leading to an increase in asbestos use. Shipyards along the Gulf Coast, oil refineries in Houston and Beaumont, and manufacturing plants in cities like Dallas and Fort Worth relied heavily on asbestos-containing materials. Workers in these industries faced substantial exposure risks, often without adequate protection or awareness of the dangers posed by asbestos fibers.
Legacy of Disease: The widespread use of asbestos in Texas industries has left a lasting legacy of disease and health complications. Thousands of workers and residents have been diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Despite regulatory efforts to limit asbestos use and exposure, the impact of past exposure continues to affect individuals and communities across the state.
mage Source: airsafe.net.au/news/7-products-you-wont-believe-were-made-with-asbestos/
Who is at Risk of Asbestos Exposure in Texas?
Individuals in various industries such as construction, manufacturing, oil and gas, shipbuilding, and automotive repair are at risk of asbestos exposure. Additionally, residents living near industrial facilities or in older homes with asbestos-containing materials may also face exposure.
What Health Risks are Associated with Asbestos Exposure?
Exposure to asbestos can lead to serious health conditions such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. These diseases often have a long latency period, with symptoms manifesting years or even decades after exposure.
How Can Asbestos Exposure Occur in Texas?
Asbestos exposure can occur through inhalation or ingestion of airborne asbestos fibers. This can happen during activities such as demolition, renovation, maintenance, or disposal of asbestos-containing materials.
What Legal Options Exist for Victims of Asbestos Exposure in Texas?
Victims of asbestos exposure in Texas have legal options to pursue compensation for their damages. This may include filing personal injury lawsuits, wrongful death claims on behalf of deceased loved ones, or seeking compensation through asbestos trust funds.
What is the Statute of Limitations for Filing an Asbestos Lawsuit in Texas?
The statute of limitations for filing an asbestos lawsuit in Texas varies depending on the type of claim and the circumstances of the case. It is essential to consult with an experienced attorney to understand and comply with the applicable deadlines.
How Can Victims of Asbestos Exposure Seek Legal Assistance in Texas?
Victims of asbestos exposure can seek legal assistance from experienced attorneys specializing in asbestos litigation. These attorneys can provide guidance on legal options, represent victims in court proceedings, and help pursue compensation for their damages.
Write Who Qualifies for Asbestos Exposure Claims in Texas?
- Individuals who have been exposed to asbestos in various industries such as construction, manufacturing, shipbuilding, and automotive repair.
- Residents living near industrial facilities or in older homes with asbestos-containing materials.
- Workers involved in demolition, renovation, maintenance, or disposal of asbestos-containing materials.
- Individuals diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis.
- Family members who have lost loved ones due to asbestos-related diseases and wish to pursue wrongful death claims.
- Anyone who has suffered physical, emotional, or financial damages due to asbestos exposure and seeks compensation for their losses.
Victims of Asbestos Exposure:
Victims of asbestos exposure in Texas, whether workers or residents, may be eligible to file claims seeking compensation for their damages. These claims can include personal injury lawsuits, wrongful death claims on behalf of deceased loved ones, or seeking compensation through asbestos trust funds. It’s crucial to consult with an experienced attorney specializing in asbestos litigation to understand eligibility criteria and pursue the appropriate legal recourse.
How Texas Workers Were Exposed:
Texas workers faced asbestos exposure in various industries such as oil refineries, chemical plants, shipyards, and construction sites. They handled asbestos-containing materials during activities like insulation installation, pipefitting, welding, and equipment maintenance. Additionally, workers in manufacturing facilities used asbestos in products like gaskets, brake pads, and insulation, leading to inhalation or ingestion of asbestos fibers.
How Texas Residents Were Exposed:
Texas residents were exposed to asbestos in their homes, workplaces, and public buildings constructed before asbestos regulations were implemented. Asbestos-containing materials in buildings, including insulation, roofing, flooring, and pipes, degraded over time, releasing asbestos fibers into the air. Residents living near industrial facilities, shipyards, or oil refineries faced secondary exposure through environmental contamination. Moreover, asbestos fibers released during renovation, demolition, or natural disasters posed risks to nearby communities, leading to potential inhalation or ingestion of asbestos fibers.
Texas Military Veterans and Asbestos Exposure:
Texas military veterans, having served their country, faced significant asbestos exposure during their service. Here’s an overview of their situation:
Asbestos Exposure in Military Service: Veterans were frequently exposed to asbestos during their time in the Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard. Ships, aircraft, vehicles, barracks, and military bases utilized asbestos-containing materials extensively.
Types of Asbestos-Related Diseases: Exposure to asbestos posed serious health risks, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Mesothelioma, especially, can develop decades after initial exposure, with symptoms often surfacing 20 to 50 years later.
Legal Options: Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma have legal recourse and can file lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers, suppliers, and negligent parties responsible for their exposure. These lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.
VA Benefits: Texas veterans are eligible for VA benefits, including disability compensation, healthcare, and assistance with filing VA claims related to mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses.
Medical Treatment and Support: Veterans diagnosed with mesothelioma can access specialized medical treatment and support services through VA hospitals, cancer centers, and mesothelioma specialists in Texas, ensuring they receive the care they need.
FIND OUT IF YOU QUALIFY TODAY! – Call Our Nationwide Toll-Free Mesothelioma Helpline – 888.640.0914
Asbestos Exposure in Texas Counties:
Texas has 254 counties. This Texas county list includes only counties with populations of 30,000 and above. Smaller population cities in Texas will have similar asbestos exposure risks. Other cities not listed here also have experienced asbestos exposure due to similar industrial activities and aging infrastructure.
Aransas County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials.
Archer County: Construction projects and older building structures decisively posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition.
Armstrong County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, as asbestos is naturally found in some mineral deposits.
Atascosa County: Workers in oil refineries and chemical plants faced definitive risks of asbestos exposure during maintenance and repair work.
Austin County: Industrial activities like manufacturing and construction undeniably exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation and fireproofing.
Bailey County: Agricultural activities and older building structures undeniably contributed to asbestos exposure, especially during demolition and renovation projects.
Bandera County: Construction projects and older building materials undoubtedly posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Bastrop County: Workers in industries such as manufacturing and construction unquestionably faced risks of asbestos exposure during the installation and removal of asbestos-containing products.
Baylor County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in mining operations and agricultural activities where asbestos-containing materials were used.
Bee County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Bell County: Construction projects and older building structures undoubtedly posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents, particularly during demolition and renovation activities.
Bexar County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction.
Blanco County: Workers in industries such as manufacturing and construction undeniably faced risks of asbestos exposure during the handling and installation of asbestos-containing materials.
Borden County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing operations.
Bosque County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants unquestionably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Bowie County: Shipbuilding and repair activities undeniably contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Brazoria County: Workers in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly faced risks of asbestos exposure during maintenance and repair work on equipment and machinery.
Brazos County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and fireproofing materials.
Brewster County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in mining operations, particularly in asbestos mines or in areas where asbestos-containing minerals are naturally present.
Briscoe County: Agricultural activities and older building structures undoubtedly may have contributed to asbestos exposure, especially during the handling and processing of asbestos-containing materials.
Brooks County: Industrial activities like manufacturing and construction undeniably exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, flooring, and roofing.
Brown County: Construction projects and older building materials undoubtedly posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Burleson County: Workers in industries such as manufacturing and construction undeniably faced risks of asbestos exposure during the handling and installation of asbestos-containing products.
Burnet County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in mining operations, as asbestos is naturally found in some mineral deposits and in areas with naturally occurring asbestos.
Caldwell County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and equipment.
Calhoun County: Shipbuilding and repair activities undeniably contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Callahan County: Construction projects and older building materials definitively posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Cameron County: Workers in industries like oil refining and manufacturing unquestionably faced risks of asbestos exposure during the handling and processing of asbestos-containing materials.
Camp County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undoubtedly led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Carson County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Cass County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Castro County: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing undoubtedly faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Chambers County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undeniably exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Cherokee County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Childress County: Construction projects and older building materials undoubtedly posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Clay County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing unquestionably faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Cochran County: Asbestos exposure undeniably occurred in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Coke County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Coleman County: Construction projects and older building structures undoubtedly posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Collin County: Workers in industries such as manufacturing and construction unquestionably faced risks of asbestos exposure during the handling and installation of asbestos-containing products.
Collingsworth County: Asbestos exposure definitively may have occurred in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Colorado County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Comal County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Comanche County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Concho County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing undoubtedly faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Cooke County: Asbestos exposure definitively occurred in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Coryell County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undeniably exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Cottle County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Crane County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Crockett County: Asbestos exposure occurred definitively in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Crosby County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants unquestionably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Culberson County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Dallam County: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing unquestionably faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Dallas County: Construction projects and older building structures definitively posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents, particularly during renovation and demolition activities.
Dawson County: Asbestos exposure occurred undeniably in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Deaf Smith County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Delta County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Denton County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
DeWitt County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing undoubtedly faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Dickens County: Asbestos exposure definitively occurred in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Dimmit County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Donley County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Duval County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Eastland County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Ector County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Edwards County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
El Paso County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Ellis County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Erath County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Falls County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants undoubtedly exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Fannin County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Fayette County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Fisher County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Floyd County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Foard County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Fort Bend County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Franklin County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Freestone County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Frio County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Gaines County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Galveston County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Garza County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Gillespie County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Glasscock County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Goliad County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Gonzales County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Gray County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Grayson County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Gregg County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Grimes County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Guadalupe County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Hale County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Hall County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Hamilton County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Hansford County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Hardeman County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Hardin County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Harris County: Construction projects and older building materials unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents due to the presence of asbestos in insulation and roofing materials.
Harrison County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Hartley County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Haskell County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Hays County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Hemphill County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Henderson County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Hidalgo County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Hill County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Hockley County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Hood County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Hopkins County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Houston County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Howard County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Hudspeth County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Hunt County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Hutchinson County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Irion County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Jack County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Jackson County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Jasper County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Jeff Davis County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Jefferson County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Jim Hogg County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Jim Wells County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Johnson County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Jones County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Karnes County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Kaufman County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Kendall County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Kenedy County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Kent County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Kerr County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Kimble County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
King County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Kinney County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Kleberg County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Knox County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
La Salle County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Lamar County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Lamb County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Lampasas County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Lavaca County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Lee County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Leon County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Liberty County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Limestone County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Lipscomb County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Live Oak County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Llano County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Loving County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Lubbock County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing
Lynn County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Madison County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Marion County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Martin County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Mason County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Matagorda County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Maverick County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
McCulloch County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
McLennan County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
McMullen County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Medina County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Menard County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Midland County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Milam County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Mills County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Mitchell County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Montague County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Montgomery County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Moore County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Morris County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Motley County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Nacogdoches County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Navarro County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Newton County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Nolan County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Nueces County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Ochiltree County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Oldham County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Orange County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Palo Pinto County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Panola County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Parker County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Parmer County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Pecos County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Polk County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Potter County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Presidio County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining
Rains County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Randall County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Reagan County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Real County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Red River County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Reeves County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Refugio County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Roberts County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Robertson County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Rockwall County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Runnels County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Rusk County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Sabine County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
San Augustine County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
San Jacinto County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
San Patricio County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
San Saba County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Schleicher County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Scurry County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Shackelford County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Shelby County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Sherman County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Smith County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Somervell County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Starr County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Stephens County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Sterling County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Stonewall County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Sutton County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Swisher County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Tarrant County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Taylor County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Terrell County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Terry County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Throckmorton County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Titus County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Tom Green County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Travis County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Trinity County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Tyler County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Upshur County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Upton County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Uvalde County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Val Verde County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Van Zandt County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Victoria County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Walker County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Waller County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Ward County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Washington County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Webb County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Wharton County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Wheeler County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Wichita County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Wilbarger County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Willacy County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Williamson County: Workers in industries such as oil drilling and construction definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials.
Wilson County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in industries such as oil and gas extraction, particularly during drilling and processing activities.
Winkler County: Industrial activities in lumber mills and manufacturing plants undeniably led to asbestos exposure among workers handling asbestos-containing products.
Wise County: Shipbuilding and repair activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and repair.
Wood County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
Yoakum County: Workers in industries like agriculture and manufacturing definitively faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials.
Young County: Asbestos exposure occurred undoubtedly in mining operations, particularly during the extraction and processing of asbestos-containing minerals.
Zapata County: Industrial activities in oil refineries and chemical plants definitively exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery.
Zavala County: Construction projects and older building structures unquestionably posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities.
FIND OUT IF YOU QUALIFY TODAY! – Call Our Nationwide Toll-Free Mesothelioma Helpline – 888.640.0914
Asbestos Exposure in Texas Cities:
Texas’s urban centers face the legacy of asbestos exposure from industrial operations and aging infrastructure. Cities like Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio have reported cases of asbestos-related diseases due to industrial activities and older building structures. Workers in sectors like construction and manufacturing are at increased risk, emphasizing the importance of ongoing mitigation efforts.
Texas has over 1,200 incorporated cities and towns. This Texas city list includes only cities with populations of 30,000 and above. Smaller population cities in Texas will have similar asbestos exposure risks. Other cities not listed here also have experienced asbestos exposure due to similar industrial activities and aging infrastructure.
Abilene: Industrial activities, including manufacturing and construction, led to asbestos exposure among workers, as well as in older residential and commercial buildings, during renovation and demolition projects.
Amarillo: Workers in industries such as oil refining and chemical processing were exposed to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Arlington: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Austin: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Baytown: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Beaumont: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Brownsville: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Bryan: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Carrollton: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Cedar Park: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
College Station: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Conroe: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Corpus Christi: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Dallas: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Denton: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Edinburg: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
El Paso: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Euless: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Fort Worth: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Frisco: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Garland: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Grand Prairie: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Harlingen: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Houston: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Irving: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Killeen: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Laredo: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
League City: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Lewisville: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Longview: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Lubbock: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Mansfield: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
McAllen: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
McKinney: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Mesquite: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Midland: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Mission: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Missouri City: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
New Braunfels: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
North Richland Hills: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Odessa: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Pasadena: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Pearland: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Pflugerville: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Pharr: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Plano: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Port Arthur: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Richardson: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Round Rock: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Rowlett: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
San Angelo: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
San Antonio: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
San Marcos: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Sherman: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Sugar Land: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Temple: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Texarkana: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Texas City: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
The Colony: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Tyler: Shipbuilding and petrochemical refining activities definitively contributed to asbestos exposure among workers due to the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in ship construction and maintenance.
Victoria: Industrial activities, particularly in oil refining and chemical processing, exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in insulation, piping, and machinery during daily operations and maintenance activities.
Waco: Workers in industries such as agriculture and manufacturing faced risks of asbestos exposure due to the use of asbestos-containing products and materials in various industrial processes and equipment.
Wichita Falls: Construction projects and older building structures posed risks of asbestos exposure to workers and residents during renovation and demolition activities in this rapidly growing urban center.
Wylie: Industrial facilities and construction projects exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials used in manufacturing, construction, and automotive repair, particularly in older buildings and infrastructure.
Diagnosed With Mesothelioma?
If you or a family member has received a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, you probably have numerous questions about managing the illness and pursuing legal recourse against asbestos manufacturers and companies accountable for your asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma is an extremely lethal disease, with an average survival time of 4-18 months, as per the American Cancer Society. Reach out to our toll-free number now to connect with a live mesothelioma counselor who can address many of your inquiries and offer you the reassurance you seek.
Family Member Died from Mesothelioma?
If you have a family member who has died from Mesothelioma cancer, you should immediately consult with an experienced Mesothelioma diagnosis lawyer about what compensation may be available to you from asbestos trust funds that total more than $30 billion.
We have seen many families lose their right to file a lawsuit because their Statute of Limitations had expired while they were grieving. We know it is a tough time to grieve the loss of a loved one, but please do not let your Statute of Limitations expire for filing your Mesothelioma lawsuit. In most states, the Statute of Limitations is 1-3 years.
It is VERY IMPORTANT that you file your Mesothelioma claim within your state’s Statute of Limitations.
Taking Legal Action
When confronted with the devastating impact of a mesothelioma diagnosis resulting from asbestos exposure, pursuing legal action becomes a crucial step towards securing the compensation you rightly deserve. Our team is here to assist you in initiating a mesothelioma lawsuit with an experienced mesothelioma attorney, ensuring the protection of your rights and the delivery of justice. Discover today which Asbestos Trust Funds you may be eligible for to receive compensation.
Schedule a FREE Case Consultation
Scheduling a free case consultation is your first step toward seeking justice in mesothelioma cancer lawsuits. We are ready to assess your unique situation and provide the guidance you will need during this challenging time. Take this essential step toward pursuing fair compensation for your mesothelioma-related injuries.
Get Help from an Experienced Mesothelioma Attorney
When dealing with the complexities of mesothelioma cancer lawsuits, getting help from an experienced injury attorney is crucial. For more than 24 years, we have assisted workers, veterans, and families in obtaining the compensation they deserved from negligent asbestos companies. Contact us at 888.640.0914 to secure the support you will need throughout your pursuit of fair and just compensation.
24 Hour Call Back Guarantee!
Fill out our free Mesothelioma case evaluation form and an experienced Mesothelioma lawyer will call you to immediately start processing your claim at no cost to you.
Call Today! 888.640.0914 – Chat Available 24/7 – 365 Days a Year!
Mesothelioma Lawsuits: Asbestos Exposure in Texas Cities and Counties