Oregon, Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Lawsuits
Oregon, like many other states, has grappled with the issue of asbestos exposure and its associated health risks. Industries such as shipbuilding, construction, and manufacturing have historically used asbestos-containing materials extensively, leading to widespread exposure among workers. Asbestos fibers, when disturbed, can become airborne and easily inhaled, posing serious health hazards. Over the years, many individuals in Oregon have developed asbestos-related diseases such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis as a result of this exposure.
In response to the growing recognition of asbestos-related illnesses, mesothelioma lawsuits have been filed by affected individuals seeking compensation for their injuries and losses. These lawsuits aim to hold negligent companies accountable for exposing workers to asbestos without adequate protection or warning. Legal professionals specializing in mesothelioma cases play a crucial role in advocating for the rights of victims and ensuring they receive fair compensation for their suffering.
Efforts to address asbestos exposure in Oregon have also led to stricter regulations and safety measures in workplaces where asbestos is present. However, the legacy of past asbestos use continues to affect individuals today, highlighting the importance of ongoing awareness, prevention, and support for those impacted by asbestos-related diseases. Through continued advocacy and education, Oregon aims to protect its residents from the dangers of asbestos exposure and provide support for affected individuals and their families.
History of Asbestos Exposure in Oregon
Oregon’s history with asbestos exposure dates back to the early to mid-20th century when industries like shipbuilding, construction, and manufacturing extensively used asbestos-containing materials. Shipyards along the Oregon coast, such as those in Portland and Astoria, relied heavily on asbestos for insulation, fireproofing, and other applications, exposing workers to asbestos fibers during ship construction and repair. Additionally, construction projects across the state utilized asbestos in buildings, roads, and infrastructure.
Asbestos exposure in Oregon became more pronounced during the mid-20th century as the state experienced rapid industrialization and urban development. Workers in various industries, including timber processing, mining, and automotive manufacturing, faced heightened risks of exposure to asbestos fibers due to its widespread use in equipment and machinery. Furthermore, asbestos-containing materials were commonly used in residential and commercial construction projects throughout Oregon, increasing the risk of exposure for workers and residents alike.
The consequences of asbestos exposure in Oregon became evident as individuals began to develop serious health conditions, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Despite increased awareness of the health risks associated with asbestos, many workers remained unaware of the dangers they faced until symptoms of asbestos-related diseases emerged years or even decades later. Today, Oregon continues to address the legacy of asbestos exposure through regulatory measures, asbestos abatement programs, and support services for affected individuals and their families.
Who Qualifies for Mesothelioma Lawsuits in Oregon?
In Oregon, individuals seeking compensation for asbestos exposure must meet specific criteria:
Diagnosis: A formal diagnosis of mesothelioma or asbestos-related diseases by a licensed medical professional is required to pursue legal action.
Exposure History: Providing evidence of exposure to asbestos due to negligence from manufacturers, companies, or products is crucial. Detailed documentation of where and when the exposure occurred is essential.
Legal Assistance: Consulting with an experienced attorney specializing in asbestos-related cases is highly recommended. They can assist in gathering necessary documents, building a strong case, and representing individuals in court if needed.
Timely Filing: It’s essential to file asbestos trust fund claims or mesothelioma lawsuits within Oregon’s statute of limitations to ensure eligibility for compensation.
Securing Compensation: Compensation is essential for covering medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional distress caused by asbestos-related illnesses. Seeking guidance from professionals familiar with Oregon’s legal process ensures individuals receive the compensation they rightfully deserve.
FAQs about Oregon Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Lawsuits
What is asbestos exposure, and how does it relate to mesothelioma?
Asbestos exposure occurs when individuals inhale or ingest asbestos fibers, which can lead to the development of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer affecting the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart.
Where might asbestos exposure have occurred in Oregon?
Asbestos exposure could have occurred in various settings across Oregon, including industrial workplaces, construction sites, shipyards, and residential buildings constructed before the 1980s when asbestos was commonly used in insulation, roofing materials, and other products.
What are the legal options for individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma in Oregon?
Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma in Oregon may explore legal options to seek compensation for their injuries. This may involve filing a mesothelioma lawsuit against companies responsible for their asbestos exposure or pursuing claims through asbestos trust funds established by bankrupt asbestos companies.
How can a mesothelioma lawyer help with a lawsuit in Oregon?
Mesothelioma lawyers in Oregon specialize in handling asbestos-related cases and can provide invaluable assistance in navigating the legal process, gathering evidence, and advocating for fair compensation on behalf of mesothelioma victims and their families.
Asbestos Exposure in Oregon
More than 101,000 tons of asbestos shipments were received in the state of Oregon. High asbestos exposure was in Grant County, Jackson County, and Josephine County.
Asbestos exposure in Oregon has been a significant concern due to the state’s industrial history and the widespread use of asbestos-containing materials in various industries. Industries such as construction, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and mining have historically utilized asbestos for its heat resistance, durability, and insulating properties. As a result, workers in these industries, as well as residents living near industrial sites, have been at risk of asbestos exposure.
In Oregon, asbestos exposure can occur through various sources, including workplace environments, homes, schools, and public buildings constructed before the 1980s when asbestos regulations became more stringent. Common asbestos-containing materials found in buildings include insulation, roofing materials, flooring tiles, cement products, and pipe insulation. When these materials are disturbed or deteriorate over time, asbestos fibers can become airborne, posing a risk to anyone nearby.
Individuals exposed to asbestos fibers may inhale or ingest them, leading to serious health complications such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Unfortunately, symptoms of asbestos-related diseases may not manifest until decades after exposure, making early detection and diagnosis challenging.
Oregon Mesothelioma Statistics (Asbestos-Related Deaths)
- Oregon ranks 9th in the U. S. for deaths from malignant Mesothelioma.
- The mortality rate from Mesothelioma in Oregon is 14.7 per million.
- 1,700 Oregon residents died from malignant Mesothelioma.
- 2,300 asbestos-related deaths were reported in Oregon since 1979.
- Cuyahoga County, OH has more than 329 asbestos-related deaths and more than 330 Mesothelioma Deaths.
Oregon Mesothelioma Asbestos Deaths
- Oregon Asbestos-Related Deaths Since 1999: 4,748
- Oregon Asbestosis Cancer Deaths: 573
- Oregon Mesothelioma Cancer Deaths: 841
- Oregon Estimated-Asbestos Cancer Deaths: 3,364
*Statistics on Mesothelioma and asbestos related deaths were compiled from CDC (Center for Disease Control’s National Center for Health Statistics), and NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) and other cancer reporting sources.
Mesothelioma Facts and Statistics
- More than 20 million American workers have been exposed to asbestos.
- Mesothelioma cases are found in 9 out of every 1 million people.
- 3,000 new cases of Mesothelioma are diagnosed each year in the U. S.
- Each year in U. S 10,000 Americans will die from an asbestos related disease.
- 30% of U. S. Veterans will develop an asbestos-related disease in their lifetime.
- 1 in 125 U. S. males who live over the age of 50 will die from an asbestos-related disease.
- Experts believe 60,000 Malignant Mesothelioma deaths will occur between 2010 and 2030.
Oregon Veterans and Asbestos Exposure
- Military Veterans that have a 1 in 3 chance of developing an asbestos related disease in their lifetime. Veterans have the right to bring lawsuits against negligent asbestos companies for exposing them to toxic asbestos-containing products and materials.
- There are 21.5 million current living Veterans according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans who served between 1940 and 1970 have the greatest risk of developing Mesothelioma or an asbestos-related cancer. Navy Veterans who served during World War II and the Korean War have the highest incidence of Asbestos-related diseases.
- The U.S. Military used thousands of asbestos-containing products in their ships between the 1920-late 1970’s. 14 in every 1,000 WW II shipyard workers died of an asbestos-related disease compared to 18 in every 1,000 combat related deaths.
- Mesothelioma primarily occurs in Veterans between the ages of 55-75.
Asbestos was listed as the top contaminant at 32 U.S. Army base closures during the 1990s.
A recent study showed that as many as 30-40% of Mesothelioma victims is U. S. Veterans.
TO GET HELP – Our Nationwide Toll-Free Mesothelioma Helpline Number is 888.640.0914
Asbestos Exposure in Oregon Counties:
Oregon Asbestos Exposure Deaths by County Asbestos exposure is not limited to Oregon’s cities; it extends to various counties within the state. Counties such as Multnomah, Lane, and Marion have reported cases of asbestos-related diseases due to industrial activities and older building structures. Workers in industries like shipbuilding, construction, and manufacturing have faced heightened risks of asbestos exposure in several Oregon counties. Efforts to address asbestos hazards, including asbestos abatement and legal recourse, are essential to safeguard the health of residents and workers across the state’s counties.
| Baker County, OR: Residents and workers in Baker County faced asbestos exposure risks from various sources, including mining operations, construction materials, and industrial facilities, potentially leading to asbestos-related diseases like Mesothelioma. | ||
| Benton County, OR: Individuals in Benton County encountered asbestos exposure risks in construction projects, residential buildings, and industrial settings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Clackamas County, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Clackamas County were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities. | ||
| Clatsop County, OR: Shipyard workers and residents in Clatsop County faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, shipbuilding, and the use of asbestos-containing materials in older buildings and structures. | ||
| Columbia County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Columbia County encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, building materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating vigilance and precautionary measures. | ||
| Coos County, OR: Workers in shipyards, timber mills, and industrial facilities in Coos County were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, emphasizing the need for workplace safety protocols and health monitoring. | ||
| Crook County, OR: Residents and workers in Crook County faced asbestos exposure risks from construction projects, mining activities, and natural asbestos deposits, highlighting the importance of environmental monitoring and health awareness. | ||
| Curry County, OR: Individuals in Curry County encountered asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and older buildings, underscoring the need for community education and asbestos abatement efforts to reduce health hazards. | ||
| Deschutes County, OR: Construction workers, firefighters, and industrial employees in Deschutes County were at risk of asbestos exposure from building renovations, firefighting activities, and industrial processes, necessitating stringent safety measures and protective equipment. | ||
| Douglas County, OR: Timber industry workers, construction professionals, and residents in Douglas County faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and natural asbestos deposits, requiring proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Gilliam County, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Gilliam County encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, building materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and remediation efforts. | ||
| Grant County, OR: Miners, construction workers, and residents in Grant County faced asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and older buildings, highlighting the need for workplace safety regulations and public health initiatives. | ||
| Harney County, OR: Residents and workers in Harney County encountered asbestos exposure risks from natural asbestos deposits, construction materials, and industrial activities, necessitating comprehensive risk assessments and community outreach efforts. | ||
| Hood River County, OR: Agricultural workers, construction professionals, and residents in Hood River County faced asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, building materials, and industrial processes, highlighting the importance of environmental monitoring and protective measures. | ||
| Jackson County, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Jackson County were at risk of asbestos exposure from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Jefferson County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Jefferson County encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, building materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Josephine County, OR: Miners, construction workers, and residents in Josephine County faced asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and natural asbestos deposits, highlighting the importance of workplace safety regulations and community health initiatives. | ||
| Klamath County, OR: Workers in lumber mills, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Klamath County were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, emphasizing the need for occupational safety measures and health surveillance. | ||
| Lake County, OR: Residents and workers in Lake County faced asbestos exposure risks from natural asbestos deposits, construction materials, and industrial activities, necessitating comprehensive risk assessments and environmental remediation efforts. | ||
| Lane County, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Lane County encountered asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the importance of workplace safety regulations and public health initiatives. | ||
| Lincoln County, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Lincoln County faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| Linn County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Linn County encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Malheur County, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Malheur County faced asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Marion County, OR: Workers in manufacturing plants, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Marion County were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, highlighting the need for workplace safety regulations and health surveillance. | ||
| Morrow County, OR: Residents and workers in Morrow County encountered asbestos exposure risks from agricultural activities, construction materials, and industrial processes, necessitating comprehensive risk assessments and community outreach efforts. | ||
| Multnomah County, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Multnomah County were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of awareness and preventive measures. | ||
| Polk County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Polk County faced asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Sherman County, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Sherman County encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, highlighting the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Tillamook County, OR: Timber industry workers, construction professionals, and residents in Tillamook County faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Umatilla County, OR: Workers in agricultural fields, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Umatilla County were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, emphasizing the need for occupational safety measures and health surveillance. | ||
| Union County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Union County encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Wallowa County, OR: Residents and workers in Wallowa County faced asbestos exposure risks from agricultural activities, construction materials, and industrial processes, necessitating comprehensive risk assessments and community outreach efforts. | ||
| Wasco County, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Wasco County encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, highlighting the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Washington County, OR: Timber industry workers, construction professionals, and residents in Washington County faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Wheeler County, OR: Miners, construction workers, and residents in Wheeler County faced asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and natural asbestos deposits, emphasizing the importance of workplace safety regulations and community health initiatives. | ||
| Yamhill County, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Yamhill County encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. |
Asbestos Exposure in Oregon Cities:
Oregon has several cities where asbestos exposure has been a concern due to the prevalence of industries and older buildings. Cities like Portland, Eugene, and Salem have a history of asbestos use in shipbuilding, construction, and manufacturing industries. This has put workers and residents at risk of exposure to asbestos fibers over the years. Asbestos-containing materials in aging infrastructure and the renovation or demolition of older buildings pose ongoing hazards. Awareness and safety measures are crucial to mitigate asbestos-related health risks in these urban areas.
| Albany, OR: Residents and workers in Albany encountered asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Aloha, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Aloha were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Altamont, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Altamont faced asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Ashland, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Ashland encountered asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Beaverton, OR: Workers in manufacturing plants, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Beaverton were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, highlighting the need for workplace safety regulations and health surveillance. | ||
| Bend, OR: Construction workers, firefighters, and industrial employees in Bend were at risk of asbestos exposure from building renovations, firefighting activities, and industrial processes, necessitating stringent safety measures and protective equipment. | ||
| Bethany, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Bethany encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Canby, OR: Residents and workers in Canby faced asbestos exposure risks from agricultural activities, construction materials, and industrial processes, necessitating comprehensive risk assessments and community outreach efforts. | ||
| Central Point, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Central Point faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| Coos Bay, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Coos Bay encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Corvallis, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Corvallis faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the importance of workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Dallas, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Dallas faced asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Eugene, OR: Workers in lumber mills, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Eugene were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, emphasizing the need for occupational safety measures and health surveillance. | ||
| Forest Grove, OR: Residents and workers in Forest Grove encountered asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Four Corners, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Four Corners were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Grants Pass, OR: Miners, construction workers, and residents in Grants Pass faced asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and natural asbestos deposits, emphasizing the importance of workplace safety regulations and community health initiatives. | ||
| Gresham, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Gresham faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| Hayesville, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Hayesville encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Hermiston, OR: Residents and workers in Hermiston faced asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Hillsboro, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Hillsboro were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Jackson, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Jackson encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Keizer, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Keizer faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Klamath Falls, OR: Workers in manufacturing plants, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Klamath Falls were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, highlighting the need for workplace safety regulations and health surveillance. | ||
| Lake Oswego, OR: Construction workers, firefighters, and industrial employees in Lake Oswego were at risk of asbestos exposure from building renovations, firefighting activities, and industrial processes, necessitating stringent safety measures and protective equipment. | ||
| Lebanon, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Lebanon faced asbestos exposure risks from agricultural activities, construction materials, and industrial processes, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Medford, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Medford faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| Milwaukie, OR: Residents and workers in Milwaukie encountered asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Newberg, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Newberg were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Oak Grove, OR: Industrial workers, construction professionals, and residents in Oak Grove encountered asbestos exposure risks from manufacturing processes, construction materials, and environmental contamination, necessitating proactive risk management strategies and health monitoring. | ||
| Oregon City, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Oregon City faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Pendleton, OR: Miners, construction workers, and residents in Pendleton faced asbestos exposure risks from mining operations, construction materials, and natural asbestos deposits, emphasizing the importance of workplace safety regulations and community health initiatives. | ||
| Portland, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Portland faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| Redmond, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Redmond encountered asbestos exposure risks from soil contamination, construction materials, and industrial activities, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Roseburg, OR: Residents and workers in Roseburg faced asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Salem, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Salem were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Sherwood, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Sherwood faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. | ||
| Springfield, OR: Workers in manufacturing plants, construction sites, and industrial facilities in Springfield were at risk of asbestos exposure from machinery, equipment, and building materials, highlighting the need for workplace safety regulations and health surveillance. | ||
| Tigard, OR: Construction workers, firefighters, and industrial employees in Tigard were at risk of asbestos exposure from building renovations, firefighting activities, and industrial processes, necessitating stringent safety measures and protective equipment. | ||
| Troutdale, OR: Agricultural workers, construction crews, and residents in Troutdale faced asbestos exposure risks from agricultural activities, construction materials, and industrial processes, emphasizing the importance of environmental assessments and protective measures. | ||
| Tualatin, OR: Shipyard workers, timber industry employees, and residents in Tualatin faced asbestos exposure risks from maritime activities, logging operations, and building materials, underscoring the need for workplace safety protocols and environmental monitoring. | ||
| West Linn, OR: Residents and workers in West Linn encountered asbestos exposure risks from construction materials, industrial sites, and older buildings, highlighting the importance of awareness and preventive measures to mitigate health hazards. | ||
| Wilsonville, OR: Construction workers, industrial employees, and residents in Wilsonville were at risk of asbestos exposure due to the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, infrastructure, and manufacturing facilities, emphasizing the importance of health awareness and precautionary measures. | ||
| Woodburn, OR: Timber industry workers, construction crews, and residents in Woodburn faced asbestos exposure risks from logging operations, building materials, and environmental contamination, highlighting the need for workplace safety protocols and public health interventions. |
Asbestos Cover up – Quotes from Asbestos Executives
Evidence in thousands of court documents have shown that asbestos companies hid and destroyed memos, documents and ignored doctor’s medical reports about the dangers of asbestos exposure. Despite all of the information about the deadly dangers of asbestos exposure available in the scientific and medical literature asbestos companies chose not take any action to protect workers.
They chose profit over the safety of their workers and then lied and covered it up. This is why U. S. Courts are making asbestos manufacturers and companies pay millions to asbestos victims for their asbestos cover up.
“…if you have enjoyed a good life while working with asbestos products, why not die from it.” 1966 memo from an executive of the Bendix Corporation (now part of Honeywell)
In early 1940s, the president of Johns-Manville called the managers of another company “a bunch of fools for notifying employees who had asbestosis.” When asked by another company executive, “Do you mean to tell me you would let them work until they drop dead?” he responded, “Yes. We save a lot of money that way.”
What is Mesothelioma Cancer?
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, heart, and other major organs in the body. It is characterized by the presence of malignant cancer cells in the sac lining the chest (pleura) or the abdomen (peritoneum). In the United States, approximately 3,000 new cases of malignant mesothelioma are diagnosed each year. If you are experiencing any symptoms of mesothelioma, it is important to contact a doctor immediately for evaluation and diagnosis.
Diagnosed With Mesothelioma?
If you or a family member has received a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, you probably have numerous questions about managing the illness and pursuing legal recourse against asbestos manufacturers and companies accountable for your asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma is an extremely lethal disease, with an average survival time of 4-18 months, as per the American Cancer Society. Reach out to our toll-free number now to connect with a live mesothelioma counselor who can address many of your inquiries and offer you the reassurance you seek.
Family Member Died from Mesothelioma?
If you have a family member who has died from Mesothelioma cancer, you should immediately consult with an experienced Mesothelioma diagnosis lawyer about what compensation may be available to you from asbestos trust funds that total more than $30 billion.
We have seen many families lose their right to file a lawsuit because their Statute of Limitations had expired while they were grieving. We know it is a tough time to grieve the loss of a loved one, but please do not let your Statute of Limitations expire for filing your Mesothelioma lawsuit. In most states, the Statute of Limitations is 1-3 years.
It is VERY IMPORTANT that you file your Mesothelioma claim within your state’s Statute of Limitations.
Taking Legal Action
When confronted with the devastating impact of a mesothelioma diagnosis resulting from asbestos exposure, pursuing legal action becomes a crucial step towards securing the compensation you rightly deserve. Our team is here to assist you in initiating a mesothelioma lawsuit with an experienced mesothelioma attorney, ensuring the protection of your rights and the delivery of justice. Discover today which Asbestos Trust Funds you may be eligible for to receive compensation.
Schedule a FREE Case Consultation
Scheduling a free case consultation is your first step toward seeking justice in mesothelioma cancer lawsuits. We are ready to assess your unique situation and provide the guidance you will need during this challenging time. Take this essential step toward pursuing fair compensation for your mesothelioma-related injuries.
Get Help from an Experienced Mesothelioma Attorney
When dealing with the complexities of mesothelioma cancer lawsuits, getting help from an experienced injury attorney is crucial. For more than 24 years, we have assisted workers, veterans, and families in obtaining the compensation they deserved from negligent asbestos companies. Contact us at 888.640.0914 to secure the support you will need throughout your pursuit of fair and just compensation.
24 Hour Call Back Guarantee!
Fill out our free Mesothelioma case evaluation form and an experienced Mesothelioma lawyer will call you to immediately start processing your claim at no cost to you.
Call Today! 888.640.0914 – Chat Available 24/7 – 365 Days a Year!
Oregon, Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Lawsuits